Search for: "United States v. Abercrombie"
Results 1 - 20
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2015, 9:35 am
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which had granted Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) summary judgment in a religious accommodation case brought by a job applicant who wore a headscarf (a hijab) to an interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 11:50 am
" To discuss the case, we have Rachel Paulose, who is a former Senate Confirmed United States Attorney. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 8:25 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 11:45 am
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which had granted Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) summary judgment in a religious accommodation case brought by a job applicant who wore a headscarf (a hijab) to an interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
Levi Strauss registered the Arcuate design with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 1943. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:13 pm
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 8:25 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 4:41 am
And the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:46 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers "may not make an applicant's religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 12:20 pm
Kasin FIREMAN and TRAVELERS GIORDANO and UNITED STATES HIRSCH and SCHIFF BENEFITS Kealy STAEHR and MORGAN TOURE and UBOM Zurich v. [read post]
Takeaways From the Facebook Threat and Title VII Head Scarf Cases Handed Down by the Court This Week
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
United States and EEOC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
UPS and EEOC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:31 am
Abercrombie, challenging Article 1,Section 23 of the Hawaii Constitution, which provides that “[t]he legislature shall have the power to reserve marriage to opposite sex couples,” and Hawaii Revised Statutes § 572-1, which states that marriage “shall be only between a man and a woman,” on grounds that they violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:03 pm
Last week, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion in Hawaii State Teachers Association and United Public Workers, AFCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:30 pm
United States – Whitney C. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
”); United States Postal Serv. v. [read post]
