Search for: "United States v. Aiken"
Results 41 - 60
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
Prior to assuming the role of Chief Judge, Judge Aiken launched the District of Oregon’s Reentry Court—one of the first in the United States. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:38 am
On June 21, 2013, a jury returned a defense verdict in a rollover case tried in United States District Court, Aiken Division. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
(U.S., Feb. 27, 2013); Comcast v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:39 am
The Second Circuit’s 2008 decision in Cartoon Network v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Aiken: The immediate effect of our copyright law is to secure a fair return for an “author’s” creative labor. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:43 pm
Flir v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
”1 Aside from the granular problems stated above, and recognizing that the proposed amendments would in fact add to the problem astutely noted in the quote above by Lawrence Lessig, there is a global, more systemic conflict at issue within the realm of copyright enforcement litigation deserving mention. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
(A California case, Aikens v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Golan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:25 am
edited by Richard Aikens, Kenneth Richardson. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
It states that a performance “in the case of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, [is] to show [the work's] images in any sequence or to make the sounds accompanying it audible. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
United States Golf Ass'n, 205 F.3d 1001 (7th Cir. 2000). [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:45 pm
United States. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:48 pm
Aiken (copyright is for the public, so more is not always preferable). [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:01 am
Most Influential: This week, The National Law Journal spotlights 34 lawyers in 10 practice areas who, as Assistant Managing Editor Michael Moline writes, "are shaping the law, the economy, the physical fabric of the United States and the world. [read post]
