Search for: "United States v. BECTON DICKINSON & COMPANY" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2007, 8:53 am
RE 36,885 ("the RE '885 patent") granted by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm
  Procedural HistoryBecton, Dickinson and Company (Becton) and Nova Biomedical Corporation (Nova) appeal the denial of various fees sought based on an eight-year long patent infringement suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California involving patents owned by Therasense, Inc. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 9:38 pm
    Procedural HistoryAppellee Becton Dickinson & Company (BD) requested an inter partes reexamination of the ’221 patent [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 7:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Becton, Dickinson and Co., 649 F.3d 1276, 1285 (Fed. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:47 pm by Moll Law Group
Bard Inc., a subsidiary of Becton, Dickinson and Co., to pay $4.8 million to the plaintiff, a man who experienced severe complications after the mesh was implanted. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Trade Representative Issues 2012 Special 301 Report – This post discusses the Office of the United States Representative’s 2012 Special 301 Report, which focused on the state of intellectual property rights worldwide, identifies thirteen countries on a “Priority Watch List” and another 28 countries on the “Watch List,” all relating to deficiencies in intellectual property protection in these countries. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Trade Representative Issues 2012 Special 301 Report – This post discusses the Office of the United States Representative’s 2012 Special 301 Report, which focused on the state of intellectual property rights worldwide, identifies thirteen countries on a “Priority Watch List” and another 28 countries on the “Watch List,” all relating to deficiencies in intellectual property protection in these countries. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) (Patent Law Center) CAFC: Therasense v Becton Dickinson & Co (Fed. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am by John L. Welch
In re Becton, Dickinson and Co., 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1372 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am by Marie Louise
Becton, Dickinson, & Co (Maier & Maier) (Patently-O) CAFC reverses District Court’s finding that claim terms not using ‘means’ were subject to § 112 ¶ 6: Inventio AG v. [read post]