Search for: "United States v. Baxter Healthcare Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Baxter Healthcare Corp., No. 92-CV-0314, 2001 WL 967608, at *3 (N.D.N.Y. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 599 F.3d 728 (7th Cir. 2010) – that ordered FNC transfer under circumstances virtually identical to the case at issue. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm by Bexis
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 599 F.3d 728 (7th Cir. 2010) (Taiwanese cases sent back to Taiwan); Abad v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
Cir. 2003) (citing Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:14 am by Sean Wajert
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 599 F.3d 728, 732 (7th Cir. 2010). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Baxter Healthcare Corp., No. 92-CV-0314, 2001 WL 967608, at *3 (N.D.N.Y. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
Baxter Healthcare Corp (Gray on Claims) District Court E D Texas: Qui tam plaintiff cites Professor Crouch’s question to readers as proof that patent expiration dates are not readily ascertainable: North Texas Patent Group, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Baxter Healthcare Corp (271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Summary judgment arguments not made originally not reclaimable: Wm. [read post]