Search for: "United States v. Bristol"
Results 61 - 80
of 229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
United States, 597 F. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
USA (Bristol Bay Pebble Mine; Clean Water Act; state sovereignty) Four petitions for certiorari were denied on 10/2/2023: Bird Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:15 pm
The company does, however, offer ADRs in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
” Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:41 pm
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:12 am
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation)Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Background: State Sovereign Immunity The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
However NM argued that Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust [1999] ECC 167 extended this duty to disclose risks where “there is a significant risk which would affect the judgment of a reasonable patient”[4]. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
United States, 376 U.S. 364, 367 (1964). [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 7:44 am
See State of New Jersey v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 12:18 pm
See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
The plaintiffs, who were from all over the United States (but not from New Jersey), invoked diversity and asserted claims under, of all things, New Jersey law.The defendants moved to dismiss on a bunch of grounds, including extraterritoriality and preemption. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:33 pm
Pharmaceutical Resources and Par Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
§ 1441, “any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:28 pm
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v.Superior Court of Cal., 137 S.Ct. 1773, 1780 (2017). [read post]
