Search for: "United States v. Callaghan"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Unions representing public employees are not state actors absent evidence of meaningful State participation in the activity underlying the complaintCallaghan v United Fedn. of Teachers, 2015 NY Slip Op 08049, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSupreme Court granted the United Federation of Teachers’ [UFT] motion to dismiss James V. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Revisiting precedent is particularly appropriate where, as here, a departure would not upset settled expectations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
What United States Supreme Court decisions actually get the most action in legal circles? [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held in Georgia et al v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held in Georgia et al v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
The Curtis law firm bills itself as "the only law firm[s] in the United States" to concentrate their practice on "representing clients injured by attorneys. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm
To the more contemporary antitrust matter: Conclusions of Law and Order: United States of America v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
., Plaintiffs-Appellants, - v - THE LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 9:32 am
” Callaghan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:33 am
The United States Supreme Court has held that attorneys’ fees are recoverable as costs under The Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976[xxxi]and the Eleventh Circuit has held that fees are recoverable as costs under The Copyright Act. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:49 am
The IPKat is really disappointed that this action is being brought in the United States and not in Europe following last month's Intel v CPM ruling (see IPKat here and here), where counsel on both sides could indulge in endless argument as to the state of mind of the relevant consumer, the likelihood of confusion and the extent to which the use of the mark on the t-shirt might be expected to affect the economic activity of consumers of the claimant's… [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:37 pm
In 1920, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
The press was united in horror this week, reacting to the news that Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered outside a constituency surgery. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
Thornton, supra) (emphasis added). [8] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
United States On 22 January 2019 the US Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up an appeal in Hassell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
United States Amber Heard has sued Johnny Depp’s friend Doug Stanhope over an article entitled “Johnny Depp is being blackmailed by Amber Heard” Residents in Uniontown, Alabama, are locked in a legal battle against a company that has dumped millions of tons of coal ash there and then filed suit for defamation against those protesting against the act. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 11:07 am
State, 810 So.2d 901, 905 (Fla.2002). [read post]
