Search for: "United States v. Conway" Results 121 - 139 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
THE UNITED KINGDOM – 30089/04 [2011] ECHR 1121 (19 July 2011)  ? [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:34 pm by Ron Coleman
The company long ago established that premise in the United States, successfully forcing two restaurant companies, McBagel’s and the vegetarian McDharma’s, to change their names. . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am by Ron Coleman
The company long ago established that premise in the United States, successfully forcing two restaurant companies, McBagel’s and the vegetarian McDharma’s, to change their names. . . . [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  These awards cannot be enforced against the defendant in the United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am by Schachtman
United States Food and Drug Admin., Civ. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
” From the States and Municipalities Arizona – Voter Fraud Unit in Arizona Will [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
As Neal Katyal and George Conway have argued, a number of senators who are considering what procedures to follow in this impeachment—and whether to call witnesses—are lawyers who should understand basic principles of the justice system. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
Michael Conway, who served as counsel on the House judiciary committee during the Watergate investigation, has advanced a similar argument. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Jonathan Shaub
And recent assertions, particularly the OLC opinion concluding that Conway is immune from testimony about her public appearances implicating the Hatch Act, have pushed the doctrine beyond its historical scope. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am by Barry Sookman
Canada’s major trading partners including the United States and the European Union recognize that net neutrality rules do not prevent courts or government agencies from ordering the removal of illegal content from the Internet. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Similarly, putative Senate moderates like Lindsey Graham and John McCain joined in to claim that Clinton’s win did not make her a legitimate president.These Republicans pointed to Clinton’s relatively slim margins of victory in key states like New Hampshire, Michigan, Florida, Pennsylvania, and Nevada. [read post]