Search for: "United States v. Dennings"
Results 41 - 60
of 337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2013, 12:06 am
This brief paper examines whether the United States violated any rules of public international law when tapping the Chancellor's cell phone. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 2:27 pm
United States, 712 F. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Holly Fernandez Lynch & Gregory Curfman, Bosses in the Bedroom: Religious Employers and the Future of Employer-Sponsored Health Care, (Law, Religion, and Health in the United States (Holly Fernandez Lynch, I. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 10:40 am
Khouri (State Taxation - Tobacco)Wilson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
United States, 281 U. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am
Lyle Dennison, reporter for the SCOTUSblog (Supreme Court of the United States Blog), stated in his blog dated June 20th, 2011 that it appears that each woman in the class-action suit in Dukes v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
If a drug company, in 1995, marketed antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) for the prevention of cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States, the government might well have prosecuted the company for misbranding. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
Lord Denning, reportedly the most celebrated English judge of the 20th century, colorfully put it best: “As a moth is drawn to the light, so is a litigant drawn to the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
The Court, explicitly recognizing the relationship between suggestiveness and mistakes in identification has repeatedly expressed concern that police arranged identification procedures may alter a witness’s memory rendering the subsequent identification testimony unreliable (United States v Wade, 388 US 218 [1967], Stovall v Denno, 388 US 293 [1967]; Simmons v United States, 390 US 377 [1968]; Manson v Braithwaite,… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:03 am
Zherka v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:59 am
Zherka v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 8:23 pm
Section 1369(b)(1)(F), the portion of the Clean Water Act’s judicial review provision which requires that agency actions “in issuing or denying any permit” under Section 1342 be reviewed by the court of appeals, to decide petitions to review the waters of the United States rule, even though the rule does not “issu[e] or den[y] any permit” but instead defines the waters that fall within Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:41 pm
(California law provides that its courts may exercise jurisdiction “on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution . . . of the United States,” Cal. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:48 pm
See, United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:27 pm
In Founding-Era Translations of the United States Constitution, Christina Mulligan, Michael Douma, Hans Lind, and Brian Quinn analyze how these translations might aid interpretation of the Constitution today.Of greatest interest to readers of this blog is likely the Progress Clause:English: To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries . . . .German: Die… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:00 pm
United States and Cantwell v. [read post]
