Search for: "United States v. Elliott"
Results 101 - 120
of 204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2014, 5:26 am
Elliott, 50 F.3d 180 (U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:07 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am
Kevin Elliott received his doctorate in the History and Philosophy of Science (Notre Dame), and he is currently an Associate Professor in Michigan State University. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 9:00 pm
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States at the D.C. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
Indeed, the very definition of Promote states that it is “determined under Sections 6.1 (a)(iii)-(v). [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:52 am
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1978 opinion in Oliphant v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:14 pm
Instead, in 1998, the United States Supreme Court confirmed that the main federal anti-discrimination law (Title VII, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:48 am
Bush signed into law a repatriation holiday, or corporate tax holiday, allowing multinational companies holding funds offshore to bring those into the United States at a reduced tax rate of just 5.25%, dramatically lower than the 35% statutory rate. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:30 am
Acanac Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:12 am
Elliott & Lundstrom v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v The Mail on… [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:52 am
National Bank of Missouri, 18 Wall. 409, 410; Elliott v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce… [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 10:30 am
United States: Elliott Welsh's Two Religious Tests, which appeared in First Amendment Stories, ed. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
Al- Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54 - Supreme Court clarifies meaning of “guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations” for the purpose of refusing refugee status, two applicants lose appeal. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
As I noted in my introduction, I want to focus on one aspect of the medical marijuana laws: those relating to the sale of medical marijuana, which involves a little something the United States is normally quite fond of – capitalism. [read post]
