Search for: "United States v. Floyd" Results 81 - 100 of 410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2010, 1:18 am
Their data was stored on webservers in Germany and Austria but could be accessed via links from elsewhere, including the United Kingdom. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
United States—”anticanonical,” but not infamous.Perhaps he avoided the language of infamy because his analysis was empirical, rather than normative. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently addressed the issue of novelty as an element of an idea theft claim in Wexler v Hasbro. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
On Friday, Floyd LJ gave the leading judgment (with which Patten and Tomlinson LJJ agreed) in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 290. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
United States Ron Darling successfully defended himself from a libel suit filed by his former Mets teammate Lenny Dykstra. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:50 am by Legal Talk Network
“It’s impossible to figure out exactly what the judge did wrong,” University of Pennsylvania Law Professor Kermit Roosevelt says, discussing Federal District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin’s removal from Floyd, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Floyd, should be viewed as part of the same great rebellion against the United States that fired the shot on Fort Sumter later that April. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:17 am by Brian Cordery
Floyd LJ noted that he was reminded of a citation from an old case, Savage v Harris and Sons (1896) 13 RPC 364, which stated that “cases, so far as regards the law, are most useful, but when they are applied to particular facts, they, as a rule, are of little service. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" … The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit provides [under the James v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:44 pm
During the course of clinical trials conducted in the United States some years later, Cephalon noticed that the formulation used by them displayed increased side effects as compared with equivalent doses tested in European clinical trials. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:47 am by Anna Christensen
United States, a mandatory-minimum case which has been consolidated with Abbott v. [read post]