Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics" Results 261 - 280 of 951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   This question was left unanswered for a very long time, until the United States Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”) resolved it in  Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
  The understanding of the traditional judicial function within common law cultures―and the granting of the judicial power to the federal courts within the general government of the United States―made the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:44 am by Jon Lewis
On May 29, two contracted Federal Protective Service officers were shot outside the Ronald V. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:42 pm by dbmadmin
United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481 (1968), the United States Supreme Court held that federal antitrust defendants generally may not assert a pass-on defense, because even a direct purchaser who passes on an overcharge, will likely be damaged in other ways by defendants’ violation of antitrust law. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Jeanine Cali
Last year, he argued before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Davis v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:20 pm by Larry Catá Backer
SYLLABUS Preface to Materials This “Elements of Law” course is meant to provide a general foundation for your law studies. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:09 am
Sept. 8, 2005); In re Dynamic Random Access Memory Antitrust Litig., 2006 U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:28 am by Anna Christensen
The two cases below are consolidated and the cert. grant is limited to question 1 in 09-1298 and to question 2 in 09-1302: Title: General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:05 am by SHG
Waxman, a former United States solicitor general, was caught in the cross-fire. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:18 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The complaint alleges that Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) unlawfully imports into the United States, sells for importation, and sells within the United States after importation certain digital imaging devices and related software that infringe certain claims of U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IP Think Tank) WIPO working group to reconsider rules on appellations of origin (Intellectual Property Watch) Economic downturn hits trade mark filings (Managing Intellectual Property)   Global - Patents Dynamic tools for innovation management (Securing Innovation) Dynamic tools for invention review (Securing Innovation) Dynamic tools for publication clearance (Securing Innovation) Dynamic tools for trade secrets (Securing Innovation) Eureka! [read post]