Search for: "United States v. Merrill," Results 81 - 100 of 335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
  Additionally, the United States has filed an amicus brief supporting petitioners that specifically casts doubt on the ability of the market to regulate fees. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Donald Thompson
The notice requirement is excused when a defendant moves for suppression of the identification testimony (CPL § 710.30[3]; People v Merrill, 87 NY2d 948; see also, People v Lopez, 84 NY2d 425). [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:42 am
Clement, Solicitor General for the Unites States Department of Justice filed an Amicus Brief on behalf of big business. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 6:01 am
But now, in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]