Search for: "United States v. Oregon" Results 821 - 840 of 1,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
The Court then said that states (Oregon and Virginia in that case) could apply their procedural default rules. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by SHG
Maybe the person was Muslim and prayed at a mosque (“associated with known terrorists”) or was a United States Marine (“trained in the use of military-grade weapons”). [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlWalter v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 8-1 that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:30 am by Unknown
The United States is the only industrialized nation that doesn’t have a law requiring paid vacation. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am by Lyle Denniston
This was the first federal appeals court decision to interpret the scope of the Supreme Court’s decision a year ago in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am by Tara Hofbauer
 Obama stressed that the United States would not change course in Iraq, stating, “We will be vigilant and we will be relentless. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm by National Indian Law Library
(tax records, sovereign immunity)United Keetoowah Band of Cheeroke Indians in Oklahoma v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Priority right is defined as the right of [Zuckerman] to first right of refusal to use or market seed of the [v]ariety in California, Oregon, and Washington. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:04 am by Alison Rowe
 The conference had a record number of attendees--180 practitioners from all over the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965) McKeiver v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am by Andrei Gribakov
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  Mass tribal disenrollments have broken out in Washington State and California and now Oregon (Seattle Times; New York Times). [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:17 am by Keelin Curran
Moreover, state laws in some cases (such as California, Oregon and Washington) provide as much or more protection to pregnant workers than provided by the PDA and the ADA (see this DOL chart comparing state laws). [read post]