Search for: "United States v. Philadelphia Electric Co." Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2011, 5:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
To ensure complete destruction, a fine mesh was placed on the top of the smokestacks to catch and recirculate unburnt scraps of currency escaping the fire.[3]**Also, contemplate ELECTRIC STORAGE BATTERY CO. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
Ct., NY Co., 6/20/18)Condo unit loss.Summary judgment to property's insurer.This was an action to collect on a default judgment Philadelphia, a condominium complex's insurer, had obtained against the owner of a vacant condo unit in which pipes froze and burst, causing water damage to the complex. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
Greenhouse Gas Litigation (Jennifer Smokelin, Pittsburgh) Regarding greenhouse gas (GHG) litigation, there are two main areas to watch in 2012: (i) the United States Supreme Court (and the Ninth Circuit) in the aftermath of American Electric Power v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That interpretation was based on a passing comment the Supreme Court had made (seemingly meaning just that) in the 1939 case of Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Another Reason to be Thankful — Energy Poverty in the United StatesPhiladelphia attorney Linda Evers of Stevens & Lee on the firm’s blog, Smart Grid Legal News NYU Acknowledges Bargaining Rights of Grad Students – Atlanta attorney Cary Burke of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firm’s blog, Labor Relations Today Law Firm Merger Diligence–Are the Financial Metrics Compatible? [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Jessie Canon
Rulli and Michael Carroll, a senior attorney in the Housing Unit of Community Legal Services, wrote “Filling Gideon’s Empty Chair” for the Winter 2011 edition of The Philadelphia Lawyer. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
Relying upon a Supreme Court decision in 1939, Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Babbitt, 172 S.W.3d 786, 795 (Ky. 2005); Delaware Electric Co-op. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]