Search for: "United States v. Rubenstein" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, defendants’ failure to comply with the rules concerning retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude them from recovering in quantum meruit (Frechtman v Gutterman, 140 AD3d 538,538 [1st Dept 2016]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60-63 [2d Dept 2007]). [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:12 am by Dan Bressler
” In the United States: “Lawyers Fight Bill Forcing Them to Report Suspicious Client Acts” — “Lawyers are pushing back against anti-money laundering legislation that would require them to report suspicious transactions by clients, as banks already must do. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
§ 227 Unsolicited Advertisement     Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 12:11 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the implications of the Texas v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:30 am by Lumen N. Mulligan
United Technologies Corporation and its progeny has metastasized. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:32 pm by Benjamin Beaton
United States, 398 U.S. 333, 354 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring in the judgment). [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
(With the exception of a mid-September media law conference in central London featuring Justice Stephen Breyer, all other events we tracked this summer took place in the United States.) [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 5-4 that pretrial imprisonment on a new criminal charge puts a term of federal supervised release on hold. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 4:43 am by Immigration Prof
At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein and Pratheepan Gulasekaram explain how states might challenge executive nonenforcement policies in the posture of defendants—what they call “ex post judicial review”—and suggest what this alternative route could entail for questions of standing, separation... [read post]