Search for: "United States v. Siebert" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
KAHN CLERK [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 07-14956 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
Siebert, the United States Supreme Court concludes, in a 7-2 Per Curiam decision, that the 11th Circuit Court of Appeal was wrong in finding that the time for filing a federal petition under AEDPA was not tolled due to the filing of a state court petition because the state court petition was not "properly filed" as it was untimely. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:13 am
In its opinion, issued in July 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted Mr. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MARK DEAN SCHWAB, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This appeal arises from an inter partes reexamination proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:11 pm
Meanwhile, the Eleventh Circuit Court, in the case of Siebert v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:59 pm
KAHN CLERK [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 07-15329 D.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:08 am
Penal Law §120.25 Not 'Crime of Violence' Under USSG §4B1.2(a)(2) United States, appellee v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
Siebert, 56, filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Atlanta after Judge Mark E. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 7:54 am
The United States Supreme Court's own jurisdiction is limited to deciding independent questions of federal law. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
Siebert, Inc., 512 F.3d 1338, 1344 (Fed. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:18 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the decision applies only to a category of ostensibly public workers who aren’t “full-fledged” state employees, and to which the High Court’s 1977 holding in Abood v. [read post]