Search for: "United States v. W. T. Grant Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2013, 7:59 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted summary judgment that: (1) OWW was collaterally estopped from challenging the invalidity of claims 1, 2, 4, 15, 16, and 20 of the ’237 patent; (2) claims 18, 19, 21, 22, and 23 of the ’237 patent were invalid for obviousness; and (3) Alps failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact with respect to inequitable conduct. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:24 am
See General Telephone Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:33 am
In granting that motion, the United States District Court held:[T]he Court finds that the Policy unambiguously bars any and all suits commenced more than two years after the date of the damage or loss. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 4:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
For that purpose we consider the legal position of the subsidiary units of government in the United States and their relationship to federal power. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 8:44 am
’s belongings to her in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm
” Drew Estate Holding Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
Della v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
§ 2383, which provides that “[w]hoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto … shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:17 am
Nintendo Co. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public… [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 7:53 am
Co. (3rd Dept., decided 7/22/2010) I rarely post here about cases involving default judgment motions against insurers because those cases don't usually involve substantive issues of insurance coverage law. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:38 am
Branch, Gerhardstein & Branch Co. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:52 pm
United States, 347 U.S. 227 (1954) for certain extraneous juror contacts. [read post]