Search for: "United States v. Wiseman"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2019, 4:38 pm
Citing Hamby v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:38 pm
Citing Hamby v. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 9:43 am
" Finally, citing the First Step Act, Wiseman argued the District Court erred in finding he was a career offender under the Guidelines because he had served less than a year imprisonment on each of his supposedly qualifying charges.In its decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 7:26 am
In Rothstein v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 4:58 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:55 am
Yesterday, the UCLA Environmental Law Clinic filed a brief in the California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:04 pm
” United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 1:56 am
"
Federal Decisions:
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 10:57 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 7:27 am
An answer was provided by Senior Judge Wiseman of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:44 pm
United States, 464 U.S. 16,23 (1983) (quoting United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:18 pm
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 8, S191251 —Review Granted and held pending decision in lead case, Ralphs Grocery Company v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
United States, 929 F.2d 1235, 1239 (8th Cir. 1991), decided before the Supreme Court decided Daubert.) [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 1:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am
Privacy, Right of » United States. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am
Wells Fargo’s employee, Michael Dolan, states in his declaration that he is an Operations Analyst in Wells Fargo’s Mortgage Lending Operations, located at 4101 Wiseman Blvd. in San Antonio, Texas. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
Wiseman Jr. said his decision to toss the case was supported by the plain language of the FCA, 31 U.S.C. 3729, and by case law, including United States ex rel. [read post]
