Search for: "United States vs. Romero" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2010, 1:24 pm by admin
There appears to be a split of authority across the United States on the treatment of a spouse’s right to exercise the Fifth Amendment privilege in divorce proceedings. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 7:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
A film that, for most of its life, has been in the public domain in the United States now enjoys copyright protection again. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
Now, Metropolis is copyright protected in the United States and will remain there until 2022. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 10:38 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, one copy made it to the United States where the book was already in the public domain due to a copyright notice error (similar to Night of the Living Dead). [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The people who are not counted can lose political representation at both the state and federal levels. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm by admin
Scientific studies, reviews, and meta-analyses are virtually never directly admissible in evidence in courtrooms in the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am by Jason A. Weis, Esq.
What it is: The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and Article 1, section 8 of the Virginia Consititution. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am by admin
What it is: The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and Article 1, section 8 of the Virginia Consititution. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
But it wasn't just technology vs content: two major platforms, Spotify and Deezer, urged European legislators to ensure that the globally dominant giant US technology companies (primarily Apple, Amazon and Google) don't abuse their position as gatekeepers to digital consumers, not least as all three tech giants make and operate devices, control transaction platforms and own content services. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm by Mandelman
Gonzalez, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, in granting a plaintiff’s motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, stopped Washington Mutual or “WaMu” from foreclosing on the plaintiff’s home. [read post]