Search for: "VERMONT v. NEW YORK"
Results 141 - 160
of 762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2019, 2:09 pm
In State of New York et al. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 5:24 pm
Non-attending governors of Vermont, Connecticut, Kansas, Minnesota, and Oregon all gave their approval of the document. but it was conspicuously declined by those (non-attending) of New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Kentucky, and Missouri (and the attending governor of Maryland) [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
§636(a). appeared first on Federal Defenders of New York Blog. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:57 am
On August 8, 2019, New York, California, Hawaii, Maryland, Vermont, Washington, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia (States) also filed a new petition for judicial review concerning the refusal of EPA to ban chlorpyrifos. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
For instance, Maryland permits local governments to provide a credit for expanding manufacturing facilities.[6] Similarly, Idaho allows counties to exempt TPP that is part of an investment of at least $500,000 in a new manufacturing plant for up to five years.[7] Seven states (Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania) exempt all TPP from taxation, while another five states (Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North… [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 5:00 pm
[v] Id. at 5. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 10:07 am
In Fessenden v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
New York and Vermont made changes under their property tax code to capture more tax revenue from property transfers. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
Vermont was the first. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 12:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (covering New York, Connecticut, and Vermont). [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 12:30 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (covering New York, Connecticut, and Vermont). [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:15 am
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2019-06-15 https://t.co/d7zcEqbBWl 2019-06-16 Dotcom extradition: Copyright breaches could still be criminal conspiracy, Crown says https://t.co/On8Rr6rfXE 2019-06-16 Canada’s trademark changes mean higher fees, more complexities in filing https://t.co/IDzM1OkNfK 2019-06-16 Computer and Internet Updates for 2019-06-16 https://t.co/6L0UnzSyKe 2019-06-17 Vermont Supreme Court Reads Revenge Porn Law Narrowly https://t.co/kFWR7CJlT5… [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
Only one state—Vermont—adopted Model Rule 8.4(g) as proposed. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In Himsel v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 pm
The New York law shores up reproductive rights so they will be protected even if Roe v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:15 am
City of New York, 775 F.3d 538, 543 (2d Cir.) [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (covering Connecticut, New York, and Vermont) recently acknowledged that there is no protection for such workers. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
It would also mean that candidates would have incentives to campaign in (and tailor policies to) all places where there were significant numbers of undecided voters, not just so-called swing states where the median voter is in play.The agreement, by its own terms, would not go into effect until a sufficient number of states to comprise a majority of the electoral college—that is, states whose electoral college allotments collectively total 270 or more—ratify it.Since I last discussed the… [read post]
