Search for: "WARDEN MARTINEZ"
Results 21 - 29
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
Webb (Warden) Western District of Kentucky at LouisvilleALICE M. [read post]
1 May 2010, 2:10 pm
Death penalty foes go after licenses.By CARLOS CAMPOSThe Atlanta Journal-ConstitutionPublished on: 02/01/05 After a lethal dose of chemicals flowed through the veins of convicted killer Timothy Don Carr last Tuesday night, two physicians with stethoscopes around their necks quietly entered the execution chamber.One at a time, the doctors confirmed with a somber nod to the warden of the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison in Jackson that the state had succeeded in carrying out the… [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:35 pm
Doctors' role in executions debatedDeath penalty foes go after licenses.By CARLOS CAMPOSThe Atlanta Journal-ConstitutionPublished on: 02/01/05After a lethal dose of chemicals flowed through the veins of convicted killer Timothy Don Carr last Tuesday night, two physicians with stethoscopes around their necks quietly entered the execution chamber.One at a time, the doctors confirmed with a somber nod to the warden of the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison in Jackson that the… [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
(in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-1362 Case name: Martinez-Guerrero v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
Martinez, 771 F.3d 672 (9th Cir. 2014), in which the Ninth Circuit had followed Snyder and Cisneros on Oregon eluding to find that California eluding constituted an ACCA “violent felony. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Third Circuit:Witasick v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
Thaler, 11-10870, for Trevino, although Washington might be a GVR for Martinez v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
WARDEN J. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:14 pm
Supreme Court, notwithstanding that he did not petition for discretionary review in the Texas Criminal Court of Appeals.Texas (on behalf of warden Rick Thaler) counters that the “conclusion of direct review” prong applies only when a petitioner has pursued direct review to its end; otherwise, the “expiration of time for review” prong applies. [read post]
