Search for: "Wells v. Coca Cola Bottling Co." Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2022, 8:30 am by Camilla Hrdy
Other sellers that use a confusingly similar bottle shape without authorization from The Coca-Cola Company could be sued under the Lanham Act, § 32 or § 43, even if they don't use the well-known Coca-Cola names or color schemes. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:15 am by war
The war between Coke and Pepsi over the shape of a bottle is alive and well. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Coca-Cola Co., 2010 WL 2925955 (E.D.N.Y.) [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 1:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Coca-Cola Co., 573 U.S. 102 (2014), reasoned that the FDCA and the Lanham Act complemented each other, and market competitors have extra expertise in assessing unfair competition; so too here. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am by Schachtman
Coca Cola Bottling Co., 24 Cal. 2d 453, 150 P.2d 436 (1944) (soft drink bottle); Henningsen v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 2:31 pm
Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 260 F.3d 257 (3rd Cir. 2001), which had very similar facts to those alleged by Prowel. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:34 pm
This reasoning behind this was first expressed by our Supreme Court in the case of Escola v Coca Cola Bottling Co over fifty years ago. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 8:35 am by Jared Staver
Coca Cola Bottling Co. and current product safety expectations and manufacturers’ liability for defective products. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:36 pm
Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 260 F.3d 257 (3rd Cir. 2001). [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:57 am by Mark Hipple
Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co., which held that Title VII protections could not be extended to claims of discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]