Search for: "Wells v. Johnson et al" Results 1 - 20 of 338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2012, 8:13 am
It seems somewhat rare, but it happened in a case out of Missouri, called Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
Given the composition of this working group, no one was surprised by its finding: “The Working Group noted that a causal association between exposure to asbestos and cancer of the ovary was clearly established, based on five strongly positive cohort mortality studies of women with heavy occupational exposure to asbestos (Acheson et al., 1982; Wignall & Fox, 1982; Germani et al., 1999; Berry et al., 2000; Magnani et… [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Schachtman
In the meta-analyses of studies of occupational asbestos exposure, the summary risk estimates were well below two.[14] [1]  See “Serpentine subgroup,” in Wikipedia. [2]  Lester Breslow, et al., Asbestiform Fibers: Nonoccupational Health Risks at 7 (Nat’l Research Council 1984). [3]  Appellants’ Brief at 38, in Ingham v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm by Schachtman
” IARC Monograph for Carbon Black, Titanium Dioxide & Talc, vol 93 (2010); Robert Baan, et al., “Carcinogenicity of carbon black, titanium dioxide, and talc,” 7 Lancet Oncology 295 (2006)5. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 9:56 pm
São Paulo Civil Appellate Court, Seventh Chamber (Appeal N0. 312.848-4/4-00): Editoriale Johnson SPA et al.; v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 6:20 am by Charles Sartain
The question with wide-ranging implications for Louisiana operators and mineral owners in Johnson et al. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:57 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
Journal of postgraduate medicine. 2014;60(4):377.[8] Mezick EJ, Matthews KA, Hall M, et al. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:57 am by HR Daily Advisor Editorial Staff
Journal of postgraduate medicine. 2014;60(4):377.[8] Mezick EJ, Matthews KA, Hall M, et al. [read post]