Search for: "White v. State of Md"
Results 41 - 60
of 257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2014, 7:57 am
From State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:44 am
Md. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:44 am
Md. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:44 am
Md. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
See Upsolve Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:45 pm
Claiborne Hardware, that the Constitution protected a 1960s boycott of white-owned businesses in Mississippi. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
Milward v. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 11:11 am
In re Google Android Consumer Privacy Litigation, 1-MD-02264 JSW (N.D. [read post]
4 May 2016, 1:39 pm
v=Tt-mpuR_QHQ). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:25 am
Jones, 281 Md. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
Bell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 4:00 am
LEXIS 80099 (MD TN, Oct. 16, 2006), a Tennessee federal district court rejected a convicted prisoner's claim that his free exercise of religion is infringed by the state's capital punishment law that calls for him to choose between electrocution or lethal injection as his method of execution, and mandates lethal injection if he fails to choose.The decision in Nicholas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:48 pm
Supreme Court case entitled, Jacobson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:48 pm
Supreme Court case entitled, Jacobson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:22 pm
LEXIS 99842 (ED CA, Sept. 10, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge rejected a Muslim inmate's motion for a temporary injunction to transfer him from state to federal custody because state officials allegedly interfered with his ability to fast for Ramadan in 2008.In Serna v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:09 am
This Skadden memo discusses Stadnick v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
” White had also qualified this statement by noting that, “as a citizen,” she may “share” some of the disclosure mandates’ goals (she mentioned the Dodd-Frank Act’s mine safety and conflict minerals provisions) but that, “as the [then-] Chair of the SEC,” White had to question this use of the securities laws. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 7:33 am
” “Michael V. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
(Murray v. [read post]
