Search for: "Windsor v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2011, 7:07 am by Zach Zagger
United States, arguing that DOMA violates the Equal Protection Clause [Cornell LII backgrounder] by precluding... [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:18 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  This is from the opening paragraph of his unanimous opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:36 am by John Kang
As illustrated by Justice Kennedy’s recent majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:54 am by Will Baude
It begins: Last June, the headlines said that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 7:20 am by Michael Kelsheimer
On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Windsor v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Relying on United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:51 am by Marissa Miller
Holder, and the two same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:49 am by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
United States Attorney General Eric Holder has announced policy changes in the wake of the landmark Supreme Court case of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:48 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
United States, that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:42 am by Paul Horwitz
, I think, very intriguing take on the use of animus in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm by Fabrizio di Piazza
Arguing before the Supreme Court, watching United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:23 pm by Rich McHugh
In a 5-4 opinion written by Justice Kennedy, the United States Supreme today held in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Nicole E. Stratton
Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) issued guidance addressing the treatment of same-sex spouses under the HIPAA Privacy Rule in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]