Search for: "Windsor v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,007
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2015, 1:58 pm
Rev. __ (2015), at Fordham today as part of its Faculty Workshop Series: In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:06 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:10 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:20 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:52 am
Background In United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 7:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am
Supreme Court held, in United States v Windsor, that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)–which defined “marriage” as “only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife”–was unconstitutional. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
The legitimacy of presidential constitutionalism is frequently debated, most recently in the context of President Obama’s refusal to defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:40 pm
” This provision, section two of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), was not at issue in the 2014 Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:10 pm
Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:37 am
Windsor). [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
After the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:35 pm
After the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:22 am
The DOL updated the rule in light of the landmark United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
In its 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:25 am
(United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:28 am
However, until last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:34 am
The DOL’s decision to revise the FMLA’s definition of “spouse” comes on the heels of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 7:06 am
The DOL’s revision was in response to the 2013 the Supreme Court’s decision striking down section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as unconstitutional (United States v. [read post]
