Search for: "Woods v. Smith" Results 41 - 60 of 394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2021, 2:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
The Board also set forth (point 5.4) that, on the basis of the minutes of the oral proceedings in examination, it was at least implicit during the oral proceedings, and should have been known to the applicant, that both D1 and D2 were considered as "closest prior art".V. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in February and March 2021 of the deaths of these members. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Olsen v Smith 2020 NY Slip Op 06214 [187 AD3d 675] October 29, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department is a familiar trope. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 13 October 2020 there was a statement in open court in the case of Warnes v Forge before Warby J. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Rogers Smith once asserted that commitments to liberalism were a constant feature of American constitutional politics. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
  We had a post by Lorna Woods The ICO issued a statement about the decision, as did EDPS, EDPB and CNIL. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Resolved- IPSO mediation 01201-20 Gallagher v Lincs Free Press, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 01139-20 Wood v Grimsby Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), No breach- after investigation 09696-19 Hudson v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 07463-19 Ward v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by… [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]