Search for: "Xerox Corporation" Results 41 - 60 of 293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Stockholder Litigation, [2] was decided by the same judge who recently enjoined Fujifilm’s acquisition of Xerox [3] and is important reading in the context of deals that might benefit from use of the MFW framework and for related litigation over Delaware corporations outside of the Delaware Court of Chancery. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 6:07 am
Ayresm, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Sunday, May 27, 2018 Tags: Accounting, Blockchain, Corporate forms, Delaware law, Financial technology, Incorporations, LLCs, Public benefit corporations, State law Taxes and Mergers: Evidence from Banks During the Financial Crisis Posted by Albert H. [read post]
29 May 2018, 6:28 am
(“Fuji Xerox”), the longstanding joint venture between Xerox and Fujifilm Holdings Corporation (“Fuji”). [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:10 am
Posted by Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance & Financial Regulation, on Friday, May 25, 2018 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of May 18-24, 2018. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:01 am
The first decision, In re Xerox Corporation Consolidated Shareholder Litigation, was issued by the Supreme Court of the State of New York [1] and involved a two-part injunction by the court. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 7:31 am by John Buhl
The nucleus was Stanford University, and the exchange of ideas and talent around the university and early corporate innovators located nearby quite literally changed the world. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 3:23 am by Broc Romanek
In his highly publicized campaign against Xerox, Darwin Deason, the third largest shareholder of Xerox, recently commenced an action in New York State Supreme Court seeking to enjoin Xerox from enforcing its December 11, 2017 nomination deadline based on the Delaware standard on this issue. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 3:23 am by Broc Romanek
In his highly publicized campaign against Xerox, Darwin Deason, the third largest shareholder of Xerox, recently commenced an action in New York State Supreme Court seeking to enjoin Xerox from enforcing its December 11, 2017 nomination deadline based on the Delaware standard on this issue. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
O’Brien worked at Xerox Legal and Compliance Solutions for more than ten years, most recently as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Xerox, wherein CSU had alleged a Section 2 Sherman Act violation:The CAFC interpreted prior case law and Section 271(d) of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. 271(d),3 to establish that a patent holder generally has no obligation to license or sell its intellectual property, and that privilege is not negated by the antitrust laws. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:20 pm by Dave Maass
One of the main manufactures of this technology is Harris Corporation, whose "Stingray" has become short-hand for all related technologies, just as Xerox and Kleenex have become synonymous with photocopying and tissues. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee participated in a health insurance program through ACS and affiliated company Xerox Business Services (the court labeled the corporate relationship as “murky” and referred to the two as a single entity). [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 1:39 pm by Amanda Fortuna
Xerox Provisions Introduced during the acquisition of Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. by Xerox Corporation (hence the “Xerox” provisions) in 2009, the Xerox provisions have gained wide-spread use in the U.S. and in cross-border transactions and are achieving traction within home-grown Canadian deals. [read post]
25 May 2016, 6:04 am by Jonathan Frieden
., EXXON®, XEROX®) or that have a common meaning having no relation to the products or services being offered (e.g., APPLE® for computers). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:54 am by Eric Goldman
Just as Xerox would not be considered a publisher and held responsible for an invasion of privacy tort carried out with a photocopier, Corporate Defendants will not be liable as publishers for the tort allegedly committed using their technology. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by USPTO
Most recently, Hope was part of the Office of General Counsel at Xerox Corporation serving as Vice-President and Corporate Counsel responsible for all intellectual property matters for Xerox Business Services, LLC. [read post]