Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation"
Results 361 - 380
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2016, 3:57 pm
But, perhaps the broader question is why not just provide, like California does, a statutory authorization to provide non-speculative business losses associated with the condemnation/inverse condemnation? [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 4:05 am
(2) whether the inverse-condemnation claim is ripe; and (3) whether damages based on the city’s condemnation for a storm water-control facility on adjoining property were barred by the Campbell rule (266 U.S. at 372). [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:38 am
R&J then filed its inverse condemnation in state court, while at the same time invoking an England reservation to preserve their federal claims in federal court. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:57 pm
But, perhaps the broader question is why not just provide, like California does, a statutory authorization to provide non-speculative business losses associated with the condemnation/inverse condemnation? [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:38 am
R&J then filed its inverse condemnation in state court, while at the same time invoking an England reservation to preserve their federal claims in federal court. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:57 pm
But, perhaps the broader question is why not just provide, like California does, a statutory authorization to provide non-speculative business losses associated with the condemnation/inverse condemnation? [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am
Learn more about inverse condemnation claims. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am
Learn more about inverse condemnation claims. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 am
Learn more about inverse condemnation claims. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am
Learn more about inverse condemnation claims. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Inverse condemnations are "inverse" because the property owner has to sue the government (not the other way around as in straight condemnations) to stop the taking, or to compel compensation. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Inverse condemnations are "inverse" because the property owner has to sue the government (not the other way around as in straight condemnations) to stop the taking, or to compel compensation. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
Since the City chose to deny the permit, Felkay was entitled to just compensation for inverse condemnation. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
Yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Gloria A. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 11:47 am
If you are challenging the government’s right to take, or if you are pursuing an inverse condemnation case, you will need to hire an eminent domain attorney. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 10:34 am
Plaintiff filed its complaint against the County and others alleging causes of action for inverse condemnation and civil rights violations seeking damages, a writ of mandate and other equitable relief. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:54 pm
Lockaway subsequently filed a lawsuit against the County for inverse condemnation, along with a writ of mandate to force the County to allow Lockaway's project to proceed. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm
Harris Private Property Rights Protection Act -- Trial court erred by denying award of costs to prevailing city in inverse condemnation action in which court found that no taking had occurred -- A prevailing governmental entity in an inverse condemnation action is entitled to recover costsCARIBBEAN CONDOMINIUM, ETC., ET AL., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:39 pm
The trial court interpreted this provision as a waiver of any condemnation recovery from a condemning governmental agency. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:26 pm
It is true that this case differs nominally from the typical case of “inverse condemnation,” i.e., a taking by government of all economically viable use of a property by regulation without just compensation, Tahoe Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. [read post]
