Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation"
Results 301 - 320
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2011, 11:57 am
Oct. 28, 2011) - attorneys fees in inverse condemnation cases. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:35 pm
., May 18, 2010) (inverse condemnation, nuisance, damages, attorneys' fees). [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 11:49 am
Public utilities in California also face inverse condemnation claims arising out of wildfires. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Patrick has litigated actions involving the California Environmental Quality Act, the Subdivision Map Act, general plans, code enforcement and inverse condemnation. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:50 pm
The owners served a writ of mandate alleging, in part, inverse condemnation based on spot zoning of the property. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 5:14 am
Moreover, the Plaintiffs failed to pursue an inverse condemnation action in state court. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm
Rptr. 831 (1985) (inverse condemnation includes damages from fire). [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 1:03 am
Light posting this week â€â [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
Inverse condemnation occurs when a government agency prohibits development of a property. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 9:28 am
A large part of my law practice deals with “takings”—a situation where a government authority with the power to condemn, or a private entity with the power to condemn, has taken private property. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:27 am
Borough of Avalon, A-49-09, a trial judge found and an appeals court agreed that an inverse condemnation of beach property resulted from Avalon's passing of shore-protection regulations after a 1962 Nor'easter leveled the house once standing there. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 9:28 pm
” Editor’s note: Hat tip to Robert Thomas, Esq. at the Inverse Condemnation Blog for posting this. http://www.inversecondemnation.com ; See also, Bulldozers at Your Doorstep blog – http://eminent-domain-blog.com/appellate-division-affirms-75-increment-applicable-wetlands-taking/ New Creek Bluebelt, Phase 4 v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 2:39 pm
In addition to the usual legal problems that accompany development bans (inverse condemnation), it is not clear why the City believes a moratorium in necessary unless it plans on taking huge swaths of private property by eminent domain (which it might if it follows the usual course for mass transit projects) in excess of what is needed for the rail footprint, and leasing or selling off the overage. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 9:28 am
A large part of my law practice deals with “takings”—a situation where a government authority with the power to condemn, or a private entity with the power to condemn, has taken private property. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:22 pm
Gould’s Takings claim was found not to be ripe as he had not yet applied or been rejected pursuant to the inverse condemnation procedures provided in the Pennsylvania’s Eminent Domain Code. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:36 am
The appellate division held that the government can assert inverse condemnation in order to take property without compensation. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
The court also held that issues surrounding the scope of the taking are also subject to immediate appellate review (in this case, the property owner filed an inverse condemnation claim asserting the condemnor's taking of an easement for power lines destroyed the "Sylvan refuge" of her forested land). [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:33 am
The plaintiff’s case was based on theories of inverse condemnation, trespass and nuisance. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 6:27 am
(Note that the Court expressed no opinion on whether the City could have been liable for inverse condemnation or precondemnation damages under the facts presented.) [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 6:27 am
(Note that the Court expressed no opinion on whether the City could have been liable for inverse condemnation or precondemnation damages under the facts presented.) [read post]
