Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation"
Results 341 - 360
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Matt writes: Even more problematic is the holding in the syllabus, that since Blanchester did not have the authority to condemn property outside of village limits, the remedy sought, an order from the court that Blanchester file an eminent domain action against Clifton to pay for the damage to his property (the only remedy for inverse condemnation under Ohio law), was insufficient and therefore, the Plaintiff further had no standing to file suit. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
., Private Property Rights Protection Act claims, and inverse condemnation. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:18 pm
For an example of that, look no further than today's short opinion by the South Carolina Supreme Court holding that the loss of left turn access to the plaintiff's property as a result of the State's widening of a highway did not result in an inverse condemnation of property. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 2:18 pm
For an example of that, look no further than today's short opinion by the South Carolina Supreme Court holding that the loss of left turn access to the plaintiff's property as a result of the State's widening of a highway did not result in an inverse condemnation of property. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 3:52 pm
The blog follows all aspects of eminent domain in California, including condemnation, inverse condemnation, and regulatory takings. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:47 am
In March 2012, Plaintiffs, who all owned real property in Grande Oaks, initiated this lawsuit claiming inverse condemnation by Defendants. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:09 am
Learn more about inverse condemnation claims. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
If you have an inverse condemnation case, or if you’re challenging the government’s right to take, then yes, you need an attorney. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:54 pm
If the landowner is forced to bring an inverse condemnation claim, the property owner is entitled to a reimbursement of attorney's fees, appraisal and engineering fees. [read post]
12 May 2017, 6:20 pm
Finally, the court found that the church had sufficiently alleged an inverse condemnation claim. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 3:15 am
On the other hand, an inverse condemnation or regulatory taking occurs when the government takes some action that restricts the use of the land in such a way as to severely impact it beneficial economic use. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:04 pm
The doctrine of inverse condemnation applies only to property damage claims, not to personal injury or death resulting from fires. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:36 pm
One thing I think is true is that there is an inverse relationship between the number of side deals a dean makes and how long they last. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 11:46 am
SCOV reasons that the longer statute of limitations doesn’t apply here and that plaintiff’s takings claim is really an inverse-condemnation claim—six years and time’s up on this one. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 4:04 am
Generally, the case involved an inverse condemnation action filed by a number of property owners against the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, alleging that the City had exacted a regulatory taking by enacting a resolution that precluded the owners from building homes on their vacant lots. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
Appellants then filed inverse condemnation claims under article I, § 20 of the Hawaii Constitution and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, alleging that Maui County had engaged in regulatory takings by depriving their properties of any economically viable use.The Circuit Court dismissed all claims in both cases for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on ripeness grounds. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 10:19 am
On Friday, November 21, 2014, the Court granted Defendant Bonner County (“Bonner County”) summary judgment on all Plaintiff SilverWing at Sandpoint, LLC’s (“SilverWing”) federal claims for inverse condemnation, or “taking,” of private property by a public entity without just compensation, in violation of the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution, and 42 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
Appellants then filed inverse condemnation claims under article I, § 20 of the Hawaii Constitution and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, alleging that Maui County had engaged in regulatory takings by depriving their properties of any economically viable use. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 8:35 am
Prominent takings expert Robert Thomas has a summary of the decision at the Inverse Condemnation blog: [T]he North Carolina Supreme Court has issued an opinion in an important case we’ve been following for a long time, Kirby v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
They can bring suit for damages due to what is called "inverse condemnation". [read post]
