Posts tagged with: "▪-Inverse-condemnation"
Results 181 - 200
of 884
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2009, 8:54 am
By Scott Mobley Two property owners have sued Redding for inverse condemnation, saying Cypress Avenue Bridge construction robbed them of income from a pair of office buildings just east of the span. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 2:03 pm
Cooper, the State has sovereign immunity), he sued in state court for inverse condemnation. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:22 pm
Inverse Condemnation The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's holding that an inverse condemnation existed, but on different grounds. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 1:49 pm
Subdivision and site plan regulation, local environment law, discrimination in zoning based on race and religion, regulatory takings, inverse condemnation, and community development practices are all explored. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 10:40 am
Currently the state laws, known as “inverse condemnation”, state that property owners... [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
The Church, in a counter complaint, alleged that denial of a demolition permit imposed a substantial burden in violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, amounted to unequal treatment under RLUIPA and constituted an inverse condemnation. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:58 am
“The Supreme Court Should End Pipeline Companies ‘Build First, Pay Later’ Use Of Eminent Domain” [Andrew Wimer, Institute for Justice/Forbes, Robert Thomas, Inverse Condemnation on cert petition in Like v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 3:01 am
Thomas, Inverse Condemnation] In-depth look into problems that develop when title to land is held as “heirs’ property,” leaving a dangerous collective tangle in place of individual right and duty [David Slade and Angie Jackson, Post and Courier (Charleston, S.C.)] [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 12:58 pm
Inverse condemnation actions were filed because of a proposed inappropriate eminent domain proceeding. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 2:54 pm
City of Half Moon Bay, No. 05-4149 VRW (Nov. 28, 2007), the $37 million inverse condemnation judgment about which I posted here. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:27 pm
The court dismissed the issue of the 2003 taking because the road that brought the debris and settlement was still in its natural state and never maintained by the county, and therefore it was not a “public improvement” for purposes of inverse condemnation. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:13 pm
Within 90 days of the decision, consistent with the requirements in the County's Code and 1094.6, the plaintiff filed a petition for writ of mandate and complaint for inverse condemnation. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:15 am
Inverse condemnation claims can be tricky, particularly in the regulatory context. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
As we all get into the holiday spirit, don’t forget to keep your skills and knowledge sharp for what is looking to shape up as a very active 2020 in the projects arena. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 12:01 am
The court held that the plaintiff's theory sounded more in tort than in inverse condemnation. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:21 am
Here's today's second decision about attorneys fees and costs, this time in an inverse condemnation claim out of the Federal Circuit, Bywaters v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 10:23 am
The first is the physical invasion taking where a claim for inverse condemnation is made when the government enters or allows others to enter, your property. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 12:48 pm
In California eminent domain actions, absent special circumstances (such as an abandonment, successful right to take challenge, or inverse condemnation finding), a property or business owner is typically only entitled to recover litigation expenses (attorneys’ fees and expert costs) in one circumstance: where the public agency’s final offer of compensation is unreasonable and the property owner’s final demand is reasonable. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:30 am
Three years ago, I wrote a Jot about Professor Brady’s article, The Damagings Clauses.1 That introduction to her work has vastly informed my scholarship on eminent domain and inverse condemnation and I again recommend it to you. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Adams), ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Aug. 2, 2011), the Court of Appeal (Third Appellate District) reversed an order granting class certification of causes of action for public nuisance, negligence, and inverse condemnation. [read post]
