Posts tagged with: "employment-digest"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,027
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2021, 5:03 pm
What follows is a digest of an NAE seminar I attended recently, which aptly summarized employer-focused bills. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:04 pm
Information was digestible and applicable, but the program’s real highlight was its incredible range of perspectives. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
As such, in this Rule 1925 Opinion, the trial court requested that the appellate court uphold the trial court’s decision dismissing the Plaintiff's negligence claim against the employer.Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:53 am
States will receive 100 percent of the FMAP 2014-2016, 95 percent in 2017, 94 percent in 2018, and 90 percent after See H.R. 2668 Digest. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 5:00 am
Source: “Digest of Recent Cases. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Below is the Reader’s Digest version. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:10 am
While we are still digesting the regulations (they come in at a whopping 497 pages), the guidance provides for two new types of health reimbursement accounts (HRAs); Individual Coverage HRAs and Excepted Benefit HRAs. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:16 pm
Existing law prohibits an employer from requiring an employee or applicant for employment to agree, in writing, to any term or condition that is known by the employer to be illegal. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:16 pm
Existing law prohibits an employer from requiring an employee or applicant for employment to agree, in writing, to any term or condition that is known by the employer to be illegal. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:49 am
But to keep things digestible on this blog, I’m going to do a series of posts (three in all, I think, but I might need four) on the highlights. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this Opinion may click this LINK.Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 4:30 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:38 am
Labour and Employment will be reissued in 2014. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am
State of California (5th—F084367) Residential Employees Performing In-Home Supportive Services—Employment Relationship with State of California—Vicarious Liability—Court of Appeal, affirming trial court’s dismissal order, held that State of California (State) had no employment relationship (either as joint or special employer) with In-Home Supportive… Digests of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review Innovative Work Comp… [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 7:29 am
An employee who alleged that she was twice demoted and ultimately terminated because she suffered from diverticulitis, a digestive disease correlated with advanced age, failed to show that her employer discriminated against her because of her age and not because of some age-correlated factor, a federal district court in Texas ruled in dismissing the claim on summary judgment (Nadeau v Echostar, October 30, 2013, Cardone, K). [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:16 am
" There's A LOT more to digest in the 408 pages of regulations, but given the ongoing and (d)evolving discourse around this one particular issue, it's worth calling it out for special attention. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:41 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this decision may click this LINK.Source: “Digest of Recent Opinions. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:12 am
He places this examination in the context surrounding each codification, and the legal history of both societies.Cairns offers a detailed analysis of family law and employment in the two codes, showing how their respective redactors selected from a defined range of sources and materials to construct their codes. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:17 am
Here, digest some Lawffice Links to keep you up to speed:The big news from last week was that SCOTUS granted certiorari in two of the "contraception mandate" cases: Sebelius v. [read post]
