Search for: "Grant v. Schering Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court Industrial Union Dep’t v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:51 pm
Schering-Plough and Reaffirmed in Peoples v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
This has been described by the Supreme Court of Canada in Whirlpool Corp v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 952 F. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:28 pm
Intel Corp. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
Emulex Corp., 732 F.3d 1325, 1333 (Fed. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:29 pm
Cybor Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
The earliest was American Home Products Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2013), and Harden Manufacturing Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Everest Minerals Corp., 362 F. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:23 am
Cir. 2002); Cyrix Corp. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:38 am
Schering Corp., 606 A.2d 1140 (N.J. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
Although several Circuit Court decisions have used the so-called “scope of the patent test” when considering whether patent settlement agreements violate the antitrust laws, including the Eleventh Circuit in litigation involving the same K-DUR patent settlement agreement (see Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:14 pm
See In Re: Schering Plough Corp. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:54 pm
Geneva Pharms., Inc., 344 F.3d 1294, 1303 (11th Cir. 2003), Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:56 am
Oct. 7, 2009) (“[m]erely alleging that [defendant] marketed the drugs at issue for off-label purposes does not state a claim for fraud”); In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Schering Health Care Ltd., [2002] EWHC 1420, at ¶ 21 (QB), (2002) 70 BMLR 88 Smith v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
” Depending on who you ask, Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 842 A.2d 174, 177-78 (N.J. [read post]