Search for: "Simonton v. Runyon"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Second Circuit Court of Appeals to again consider if discrimination based on sexual orientation is prohibited by Title VIIZarda v Altitude Express dba Skydive Long Island, USCA, Docket No. 15-3775In Simonton v Runyon, 232 F.3d 33,* the Second Circuit said that "[w]hen interpreting a statute, the role of a court is limited to discerning and adhering to legislative meaning. [read post]
18 May 2017, 5:50 am
In 2000, the Second Circuit held in Simonton v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 6:36 am
Runyon, 232 F.3d 33 (2d Cir. 2000), obsolete.A few weeks ago, the Second Circuit took up this issue, holding in Christianson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:58 pm
Runyon (and 12 years ago in Dawson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:35 am
But that may change.The case is Christiansan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
Like the Eleventh Circuit a few weeks ago, a three-judge panel concluded that it was stuck with its prior decision from 2000 in Simonton v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
Like the Eleventh Circuit a few weeks ago, a three-judge panel concluded that it was stuck with its prior decision from 2000 in Simonton v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
The district court, citing Simonton v Runyon, 232 F.3d 33, observed that Second Circuit precedent holds that Title VII does not protect against discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 5:24 pm
” The EEOC observed that 17 years ago, in Simonton v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:10 pm
” The EEOC observed that 17 years ago, in Simonton v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:53 am
The district court, relying on the Second Circuit’s 2000 decision in Simonton v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 7:18 am
In Simonton v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 7:04 am
The district court, relying on the Second Circuit’s decision in Simonton v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:46 am
Runyon and Dawson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
Well, in Simonton v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:09 pm
Runyon, 232 F.3d 33, 36 (2d Cir. 2000) (“Simonton has alleged that he was discriminated against not because he was a man, but because of his sexual orientation. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 1:35 pm
The EEOC acknowledged that 17 years ago, in Simonton v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:54 pm
Simonton v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 7:16 am
The district court, following 2nd Circuit precedent, principally Simonton v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
The trial court had previously dismissed Zarda's Title VII claim because the Second Circuit had previously held in Simonton v Runyon (2000) that sexual orientation discrimination is not a form of sex discrimination. [read post]