Search for: "Smith v. Merit Systems Bd" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 8:31 pm by Josh Blackman
Smith, 494 U.S. 872 at 881, citing Pierce v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
Smith, supra, at 462–63; see also Azure Networks, LLC v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Litigation Litigation over phenylpropanolamine was aggregated, within the federal system, before Judge Barbara Rothstein. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
John’s Metropolitan Area Bd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1181 [Tock]; St. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The positions were "unclassified" and not protected under the Tennessee Civil Service Merit System. [read post]