Search for: "Smith v. Merit Systems Bd"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Bd. of Brevard Cnty. , 888 So. 2d 1, 5 (Fla. 2004); See also §440.015, Fla. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 7:41 am
” Herrera v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 8:31 pm
Smith, 494 U.S. 872 at 881, citing Pierce v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:42 pm
In today's Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:42 pm
In today's Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:57 pm
(See Moore v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
See Barnett v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
Smith, supra, at 462–63; see also Azure Networks, LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
That systemicity (cf. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
The district court granted summary judgment against the EEOC on the merits. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Litigation Litigation over phenylpropanolamine was aggregated, within the federal system, before Judge Barbara Rothstein. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
John’s Metropolitan Area Bd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1181 [Tock]; St. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
[2] Markman v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The positions were "unclassified" and not protected under the Tennessee Civil Service Merit System. [read post]
