Search for: "A.B.1"
Results 181 - 200
of 342
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2015, 10:25 am
A.B. 1439 is currently before the California Assembly Appropriations Committee, which must act on the bill by May 29. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:09 am
Cotton received an A.B. from Harvard College and a J.D. from Yale Law School, and served as a law clerk to Justice William J. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 5:51 am
The oath prescribed in this law was quite simple: “I, A.B. do solemnly swear or affirm (as the case may be) that I will support the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:32 am
The little epidemiology that exists on the subject generally has found that all “cases” had exposure to Gd[1]. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
Additional Source: California Legislative Information, A.B. 2053 (2014) [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 6:04 pm
A.B. 1710, which will become effective in January 2015, includes provisions regarding provision of identity theft prevention and mitigation services in the event of certain kinds of security breaches (we previously discussed A.B. 1710 and its potential implications here). [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 2:54 pm
A.B. 1710 will become effective on January 1, 2015. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:48 pm
(The European Union’s 1999 ban on battery cages took effect in 2012.)Although I can’t predict what will happen next with A.B. 1437, the dismissal of Missouri v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:09 am
A.B. 1710 amends this section to add greater protection for an individual’s SSN. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 6:38 am
The measure, A.B. 2053, seeks to combat workplace bullying. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:17 pm
- 1. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:58 am
A.B. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:23 am
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GenderAndTheLawBlog/~4/qM0hU2PVzYE" height="1" width="1"/> [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 8:37 pm
June: Sunday 1 at 10:30 a.m.; Monday 2 at 12:10 p.m.; Tuesday 3 at 12:10 p.m. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:43 pm
McSweeny received an A.B. from Harvard University and a J.D. from Georgetown University Law School. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:15 am
Also, two years ago, a California Appellate Court in Juror #1 v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
See also A.B. vs. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Ecker in his January 16, 2014 opinion in A.B. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
On forms requesting her to identify other household members, she did not include A.B. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:53 am
And that while A.B. was not directly addressed by Grandmother at the trial level, she did address the “best interest” standard which opens the door to that argument on appeal.The Court found that 1) the Best Interest of the child is paramount and 2) in order to evaluate the stability and the likelihood of future disruption in adoptive placements. [read post]
