Search for: "In Re Opinion of the Supreme Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 16,173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
In his criminal trial, which was aborted and not re-tried due to concerns about the Lehrmann’s mental health, the former Staffer had pleaded not guilty. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 4:04 am
The regulations replace the 2020 regulations’ definition of student-on-student harassment with a more expansive, less speech-protective definition that departs from Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:05 pm
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 10:09 am
I want great people, whether they’re Republican or Democrat. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:37 am
I wrote:Democrats and the anti-Trump media will continue to critique Trump for making the 3 Supreme Court appointments that led to the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Supreme Court Weighs New Bribery Case as More Clashes Are Brewing MSN – Jan Wolfe and C. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court granted a request from Idaho seeking to temporarily reinstate a state law banning gender-affirming care for minors. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
[The quoted language comes from the In re Facebook opinion.] [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
Most recently, our Supreme Court held "Article I, Section 1 also applies when a governmental entity acts in an arbitrary and capricious manner toward one of its employees. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
For that reason, a properly crafted rule (of the kind most universities have) to prevent it would certainly be constitutionally permissible, and (in my opinion) a good idea. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
They're not supposed to smoke. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
We must find a way to take an appeal from the Supreme Court to the Constitution itself. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:40 am
In recent years, the Supreme Court has been asking the lower courts to re-focus attention on the historic law/equity divide. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Lower court judges may view the opinions of the Supreme Court as persuasive because they provide a basis for predicting the future behavior of the Court and hence the likelihood that the Court would reverse a lower court’s decision. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 5:01 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court recently decided In re Match Group, Inc. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm
" We're appealing. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:58 am
In a recent court case handled by our firm (In re Hudson BK 23-80949), the Nebraska bankruptcy court clarified the limits of the exemption. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:47 am
The Judicial Conference, the self-governing body of the US Federal Courts—which reports to the Supreme Court—began considering modest disclosure requirements as far back as 2014. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:30 am
Relying on the Supreme Court’s earlier opinion in Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
