Search for: "MERCK & CO., INC. " Results 181 - 200 of 663
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2013, 4:56 pm
(Enlarged Board of Appeal in G2/98).Priority can be lost by:narrowing down the disclosure from the priority document in a manner which the invention could not be derived directly and unambiguously from it (Pharmacia Corp v Merck & Co Inc [2002] RPC 41); orwidening or generalizing from the priority disclosure (Beloit Technologies Inc and another v Valmet Paper Machinery Inc and another [1995] RPC 7005 and Unilin)The story continues in Part II. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:20 am by Jon Gelman
Today's post was shared by FairWarning and comes from www.reuters.com By Nate Raymond and Jessica DyeNEW YORK Dec 9 (Reuters) - Merck & Co Inc said on Monday that it was prepared to pay $27.7 million to settle lawsuits by hundreds of people who sued the company over allegations that its osteoporosis drug Fosamax caused bones in the jaw to deteriorate.Lawyers for Merck and plaintiffs disclosed the proposed settlement at a court hearing in New York to resolve… [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:57 pm
Merck & Co., 948 A.2d 587, 595 (N.J. 2008) (citations omitted).14  Bailey v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Merck & Co., Inc., 800 F.2d 1091,1097 (Fed. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
In a decision released in July, Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/qDmsnfGJFq -> Google reveals avalanche of link removal requests http://t.co/lWd2K4FgRa -> USPTO Again Rejects Apple’s Claim of Pinch-to-Zoom Patent http://t.co/YrME6CTcOi -> Four Tips from Merck’s $180M Patent Damages Win Against Apotex http://t.co/znvGmK3isO -> Google scholar link to FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:19 am by Angel Reyes, III
  This past Monday, a New York federal judge denied Big Pharma’s Merck & Co Inc. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097 (Fed.Cir. 1986); In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981). [read post]