Search for: "POWERS v. USA" Results 181 - 200 of 1,880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2023, 6:45 am by Tom Smith
According to Chemerinsky, that 1954 Supreme Court decision, which held that public school segregation violated the Equal Protection Clause, offers one of the “most powerful and irrefutable” arguments against originalism because originalism “tells us Brown v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 1:00 pm by Tim Edgar
  In the wake of ACLU v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 12:00 am
It is a powerful indictment both of a government brazenly living outside the boundaries of the very law it purports to uphold, and of feckless mainstream journalists too embedded in privilege to serve as watchdogs. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:49 am
 With this background, consider the following decision of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia (BC) in  Equustek Solutions Inc. v Google Inc., 2015 BCCA 265, released on 15 June 2015. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
At Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman analyzes Wednesday’s oral argument in the patent case Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 2:50 pm by Matthew Guariglia
  TAKE ACTION TELL the mayor: we need protections against police surveillance Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
The contributions to this on-line symposium on S.B. 1070 and Arizona v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:07 pm
Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Copyright Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 3:53 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Tygart | Texas Federal Court Will Hear Lance Armstrong Case on August 10, Disputing, July 18, 2012 Armstrong v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:44 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
Lord Mance noted that the Supreme Court has the power to set aside judgments in the cases of both non-disclosure (where a significant injustice has “probably occurred”) and/or fresh evidence (where there is a “powerful probability” of significant injustice). [read post]
Prior to the remedies hearing the USA asked the court if it had the power to order redundancy payments in light of the principles of state immunity, however the court ruled that because the USA had already submitted the appeal and had not pleaded state immunity from the outset, it was unable to consider this submission. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm by WIMS
Murphy Oil USA (Docket 10-294) [See WIMS 10/21/09]. [read post]