Search for: "Strange v. Powers" Results 181 - 200 of 962
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
But the mandate has been challenged repeatedly on grounds of religious freedom.The Strange New War on ContraceptionThe war over the contraceptive mandate is a reflection of larger tensions in society—and a strange arc in which an issue on which there was once broad societal consensus is now divisive. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm by Daphne Keller
The PACT Act has some carve-outs to this obligation, but the bottom line is a powerful new pressure to comply, even in cases of serious uncertainty about important speech or information. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As a justice, his dissents in Lochner v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Deborah L. Brake
It also ruled in Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 6:30 pm by Dale Carpenter
[A ruling that Title VII protects gay and transgender employees may earn textualism strange new disrespect] Say what you will about the Supreme Court's decision today in Bostock v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What she demonstrates is that constitutional politics sometimes makes for strange bedfellows. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
This wide delegation of power naturally creates concerns about fairness. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
It will be a strange day in a stranger world, when a jury summons arrives in the mail with a copy of the Manual! [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am by Henning Lahmann
As the situation worsens in Brazil and President Jair Bolsonaro continues to send conflicting messages from other parts of the government, it is hard to see why China should bear the sole responsibility for resulting damage that could have been avoided if the country’s leader believed in the power of basic scientific facts. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
In this regard, it is the article 23 ‘restrictions’ clause which is the most central, although strangely this is not acknowledged or even mentioned in GC et al itself. [read post]