Search for: "United Parcel Service Company"
Results 181 - 200
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Do pregnant workers get ‘most-favored-employee’ status in High Court’s pregnancy accommodation case?
26 Mar 2015, 11:05 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., March 25, 2015, Breyer, S.). [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 10:36 am
United Parcel Service. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. suggested that the answer is yes. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 2:28 pm
United Parcel Service, was a kind of hybrid remedy, judging intentional bias on the one hand and harmful impact on women workers on the other. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:42 am
United Parcel Service, a highly anticipated decision that supports pregnancy discrimination guidance the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued last summer. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:26 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:03 am
United Parcel Service, which will address the issue of whether, and in what circumstances, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer that provides work accommodations to non-pregnant employees with medical limitations to provide similar accommodations to pregnant employees who are similar in their (in)ability to work. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 5:53 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which involves the extent to which employers must provide pregnant employees work accommodations provided to other non-pregnant workers with work limitations under the PDA. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:34 am
The Commission notified the company of its intent to begin informal conciliation. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 11:10 am
At the heart of their decision is the determination of whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act adopted in 1978 requires employers to treat pregnant workers like every other employee or like other workers with restrictions, such as temporary injuries.(1) The case involves Peggy Young who sued her former employer, United Parcel Services (UPS), under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act for refusing to make accommodations for her condition despite medical recommendations. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
United Parcel Service, the pregnancy discrimination case in which the Court heard oral arguments last week; she observes that “[p]regnancy still seems to knock the legal system off its stride, evoking in judges and employers alike a kind of tunnel vision that makes pregnancy the exception to any rule. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 8:21 am
(Photo: Larry Steagall, AP)WASHINGTON — When Peggy Young's pregnancy discrimination claim against United Parcel Service comes before the Supreme Court Wednesday, the potential implications will be greater for the court itself than for Young or UPS.Several cases involving gender discrimination and reproductive rights have hit a 5-4 roadblock at the conservative-leaning court under Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:05 am
United Parcel Service, in which it is considering whether the shipping company violated the Pregnancy Discrimination Act when it rejected a Virginia woman’s request that she be put on “light duty” during her pregnancy. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 10:02 am
United Parcel Service, the Court has to figure out what Congress had in mind in 1978 when it passed a law outlawing discrimination in the workplace against pregnant employees. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:11 am
(Liptak, 11/30) The Washington Post: Former UPS Driver At Center Of Pregnancy Discrimination Case Before Supreme Court A private woman, Peggy Young didn’t want all the world to know her most intimate business, including her two failed attempts at conceiving a child with her former husband before her pregancy in 2006 cost her her job delivering letters at United Parcel Service in Landover, Md. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
United Parcel Service, in which a Virginia woman alleges that the shipping company violated the Pregnancy Discrimination Act when it failed to give her “light duty” during her pregnancy. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:53 am
According to this case, Peggy Young, a former employee of the United Parcel Service or UPS, was pregnant with her daughter when UPS informed her that she could not be given a temporary assignment in order to avoid lifting heavy packages as ordered by her doctor. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
United Parcel Service, in its October 2014 term, a case that hinges on this very paradox within the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 10:09 am
The court noted that, in enacting the VPPA, “Congress contemplated customer service as part and parcel of the ordinary rental experience. [read post]
