Search for: "Washington v. Mitchell" Results 181 - 200 of 319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2022, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
In one of his subsequent opinions questioning the rule’s wisdom, Bamford v Penfold, L.P., VC Laster dropped an intriguing footnote referring to a “provocative article” published in 2010 by Professor of Law Lawrence Mitchell of The George Washington University entitled Gentleman’s Agreement: The Anti-Semitic Origins of Restrictions on Stockholder Litigation (available here). [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 2:52 pm by Robin E. Shea
Mitchell Quick of the HR Genius Bar advises when it comes to employee loans that you Don't Show Them the Money. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
Mitchell, 11-9843 (the habeas case “essentially the same” as Johnson v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:30 am
George Washington appointed the most Supreme Court Justices (11) and only Franklin D. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
Mitchell    Southern District of Ohio at ColumbusKAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Mitchell, with fifteen minutes of time. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
This was cause for Nixon’s concern, and his scheme to block the peace talks from occurring.Per the notes, which I have translated and summarized, Nixon instructed Haldeman that Bryce “Harlow [should be] monitoring [the situation in] V[iet] Nam. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
Martin) Washington & Lee Law School: The Role of Social Science in the Law (John Keyser) William & Mary Law School: Statistics for Lawyers William Mitchell College of Law:  Statistics Workshop (Herbert M. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
Trump is represented in the Supreme Court by Jonathan Mitchell, the architect of Texas’s controversial six-week abortion ban. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm by Jon Sands
  This case was a hard-fought battle by Deputy Federal Public Defenders Gia Kim and Jonathan Aminoff of the Central District of California.]Mitchell v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
Washington that prejudice requires a showing that, but for counsel’s error, there is a reasonable probability of a different outcome. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]