Search for: "Power-One Inc. v. United States"
Results 2021 - 2040
of 3,369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2014, 8:15 pm
United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote on behalf of the Court in the case of Troxel v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:03 am
The Court’s decision in Chadbourne would appear to limit SLUSA to cases where plaintiffs allegedly purchased, sold or held (see Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:24 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am
Earlier today, a number of international and foreign associations and copyright scholars filed an Amicus brief in the Supreme Court of the United States in the ABC, Inc. et al v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:50 pm
The City also argues that the First DCA’s decision violates the judicial policy of stare decisis, pointing to Matrix Employee Leasing, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
Rostholder v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Ann Carey JulianoProperty, Power, and American "Justice": The Story of United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
See, e.g., Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:06 am
Absent the violation of some external norm, as in a case like United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
This is not to say that state remedies are always the same as what one might get under Bivens. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
” Records on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) show that on August 5, 2013, Tesla Motors, Inc. filed a trademark application for “Model E,” in several classes of goods, including that for “Automobiles and structural parts therefor. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:07 am
New Yorker Magazine, the United States Supreme Court examined whether fabricating quotes and attributing them to an interviewee could be defamatory. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
’ L'Oreal USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
In 2004, after several years of lobbying, agents of the litigation industry managed to push a policy statement past the Association’s leadership, to condemn the requirement of evidence-based reasoning in federal courts in the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 1:57 pm
Disney filed a lawsuit in a California Federal Court, Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:40 am
Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
Similarly, United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The SmithKline panel instead decided that Witt’s rational-basis-review approach is inconsistent with—and thus no longer binding because of—the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
