Search for: "Does 1-51" Results 2121 - 2140 of 3,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 4:12 am by Timothy P. Flynn
According to an April poll, only 51% of Michiganders favors legalization; way too close to call. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:05 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Sadly, common sense does not prevail under North Carolina’s contributory negligence standard. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 These guidelines may prove helpful in the context of a “settlement agreement” resolving an employee disciplinary action.1. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by J
Those powers are in s.51, Senior Courts Act 1981: 51. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 5:13 pm
(Pix (c) Lartry Catá Backer 2015)I am happy to announce publication of my article, "The Crisis of Secular Liberalism and the Constitutional State in Comparative Perspective: Religion, Rule of Law, and Democratic Organization of Religion Privileging States," which appears in the Cornell International Law Journal 44(1):51-104  (2015).The article may be accessed here.The abstract follows. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 6:00 pm by Adam Gillette
Torvik, I neglected to mention that Minnesota is apparently also historically better at college football than Wisconsin.Matt Brown at Sports on Earth has done a ranking of the 100 best college football teams of all time. 100-76 are here, 75-51 are here, 50-26 are here, and 25-1 are here. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
Goldman, 51 Cal.4th 811 (California Supreme Court 2011) . . . .Acts in furtherance of a person� [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm by Kevin
I think those answers are both right if we assume, as he does, that your car was parked at home and New Horizons was rather dramatically off course. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
 (No. 1:14-cv-01043-GBL-IDD), a trade mark v Constitution litigation relating to to six trade marks owned by the American football team, the Washington Redskins. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:36 pm
Reed, 51 M.J. 559 (New MexicoCourt of Criminal Appeals 1999). . . . [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm by Steve Sady
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(C), we may have new arguments based on Johnson and the Due Process Clause. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
” Several court have thus interpreted the current rule in a way that does not result in automatic production of all statistical analyses performed, but only those data and analyses the witness has decided to present at trial. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:41 am by Laurie Blank
 Unlike the analysis of Israeli attacks, the Commission does not demand information from Hamas about the intended target of the attack, the assessment of military advantage, or its analysis of civilians in the area. [read post]