Search for: "Laws v. Webb" Results 201 - 220 of 501
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Peter Coe is a Lecturer in Law at Aston University and a barrister (Door Tenant) at East Anglian Chambers. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:12 pm
Contents include:Mini Symposium: Creating New Futures for All: International Law and the Protection of Migrant Children at Risk Yanghee Lee, Address: Creating New Futures for All Children: The Promise of International Human Rights Law Ron McCallum & Hannah Martin, Comment: The CRPD and Children with Disabilities Mary Crock, Of Relative Rights and Putative Children: Rethinking the Critical Framework for the Protection of Refugee Children and Youth Ben Saul, Indefinite… [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:27 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> CTS Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York State Court of Appeals has breathed some life into the whistleblower law, under which most cases fail because the plaintiff must satisfy narrow requirements in order to prove that she was terminated from her position for speaking out against public health and safety violations at work.The case is Webb-Weber v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Reversing an appellate court’s dismissal of the employee’s claims on summary judgment, the New York Court of Appeals ruled that the employee was not required to identify — in her pleadings — the specific “law, rule or regulation” allegedly violated by the employer in order to state a plausible claim (Webb-Weber v Community Action for Human Services, Inc, May 13, 2014, Pigott, J). [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A complaint asserting a claim under Labor Law §740.(2) need not identify the specific "law, rule or regulation" allegedly violated by the employerWebb-Weber v Community Action for Human Servs., Inc., 2014 NY Slip Op 03428, Court of AppealsCivil Service Law §75-b* and Labor Law §740(2)** are commonly referred to as "whistleblower statutes,” and prohibit the employer from taking retaliatory personnel action against an… [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:17 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Feb. 27, 2014) (h/t Justin Webb / Cybercrime Review) Related posts: Republisher of Youthful Sexting Photos Avoids Liability (For Now)–Doe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
[This week, I’m serializing my just-published article, Religious Law (Especially Islamic Law) in American Courts, 66 Okla. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The interim order was unsuccessfully challenged and Carr was granted an injunction against the press until further notice (Carr v News  Group Newspapers [2005] EWHC 971 (QB)). [read post]