Search for: "P. v. Lopez" Results 201 - 220 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
P. 11(a)(2) the district court had discretion to withhold its consent to the conditional guilty plea; 2) the district court exercised its discretion to reject the plea; but 3) the district court erred by reviewing the Presentence Report (PSR) before rejecting defendant's conditional plea. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
October 31,  2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Lopez-Cruz, 730 F.3d 803 (9th Cir. 2013), Border Patrol officers stopped the defendant’s vehicle, suspecting he might be involved in alien smuggling. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
"We are approaching the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964," said EEOC General Counsel David Lopez. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
What César Chávez and Dolores Huerta were to California and Reies Lopez Tijerina was to New Mexico, Corky Gonzáles was to Colorado – the face and leader of the movement – brash, determined, independent, and decidedly moving toward self-determination of the Chicano community.The founding board of the Crusade for Justice is a ‘Who’s Who’ in early Chicano activism and achievement, all leaders in their own right and all achieving positions… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
What César Chávez and Dolores Huerta were to California and Reies Lopez Tijerina was to New Mexico, Corky Gonzáles was to Colorado – the face and leader of the movement – brash, determined, independent, and decidedly moving toward self-determination of the Chicano community.The founding board of the Crusade for Justice is a ‘Who’s Who’ in early Chicano activism and achievement, all leaders in their own right and all achieving positions… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am by Marty Lederman
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, my colleague Randy Barnett, who's representing the private plaintiffs in the ACA case, has written a post focusing upon Justice Kennedy's expressed concern that in order for the Court to uphold section 5000A of the ACA, it might have to issue what Randy calls an "unbounded" opinion, one that would permit Congress to require the purchase of virtually any product--an outcome that Justice Kennedy fears would “change the relationship of the… [read post]