Search for: "Dow v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 1,045
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2017, 9:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Such support was central to ourdetermination that indefiniteness of certain physicalpropertyclaims was proved in cases such as Dow ChemicalCo. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 11:02 am
  In Dow Chemical Company v Organik Kimya, Vice Chancellor Glasscock held that although Dow Chemicals had argued for long-arm jurisdiction over all the foreign defendants, it only extended to Organik Kimya Turkey (the Turkish parent of the US subsidiary). [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 9:00 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), General Electric Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The judge considered whether there had been a “real and substantial tort”, as required to serve defamation proceedings out of jurisdiction (Dow Jones & Co Inc. v Yousef Abdul Latif Jameel [2005] EWCA Civ 75). [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 11:56 am by Schachtman
Case No. 150602485, Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Gerald Markowitz and David Rosner (filed by Rohm & Haas Co., subsidiary of Dow Chemical Co., June 18, 2015); Dumas v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
This is embodied in the Federal Courts Rules, the procedural rules for the court where most patent infringement proceedings occur (see my earlier post, Where Should You Launch Your Intellectual Property Case), which states in Rule 174, that “Every pleading shall contain a concise statement of the material facts on which the party relies…” For pleadings of patent infringement actions, the courts have identified two types of material facts that should be pleaded, as… [read post]