Search for: "State v. Pounds"
Results 2481 - 2500
of 3,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2009, 3:25 pm
In the context of a recent reference to the European Court of Justice from the English Court (Case C-127/04, O’Byrne v Sanofi Pasteur MDS Limited and Sanofi Pasteur SA) Advocate-General Geelhoed stated in his opinion that “if the supplier is erroneously sued as the producer, he should immediately inform the suing party as to the identity of the producer… If he were to fail to do so, by analogy with Article 3(3) of the Directive he should be treated as… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
The regulation is part of an effort to preserve the reproductive rights of women in the aftermath of the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:29 am
Tram in EdinburghThe IPKat is delighted to host the following guest post, drafted by Andrew McWhirter (Brodies Solicitors) concerning a recent Scottish trade secrets decision: Bilfinger v Edinburgh Tram Inquiry.Here’s what Andrew writes: “It is no secret (amongst local residents at least) that the publicly-funded Edinburgh tram project was seriously delayed, and cost almost double the original estimate at nearly £1 billion. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 1:48 pm
This book deals generously with them, particularly in chapters 5 (case management); 7 (evidence, experiment and disclosure); and 9 (costs).There are many things that I admire in this book, but I will just state two. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:00 am
Maintaining "an attachment to the labor market" for the purposes of eligibility for workers’ compensation benefits Cruz v Buffalo Bd. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 03034, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe New York State Workers’ Compensation Board requires that a claimant for benefits have “an attachment to the labor market” if he or she is seeking to receive partial disability benefits when he or she cannot perform the normal duties of his or… [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:27 am
Chapter 7 analyzes Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:48 am
It dives into the history of the 1909 Copyright Act and the resulting Herbert v Shanley Co. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:09 pm
Carias v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
Privacy In a prediction at the end of 2012 for BNA I said that 2013 might be the year in which the privacy industry remembered that the state is more threatening than a cookie. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
The original shot in this battle, arguing that the new patent package was setting a dangerous precedent since the EU Member States were stripping the Union of its powers, can be read here. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:12 pm
Prods., Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 7:35 am
[Merpel: This is not his first rodeo: Wright was previously held in contempt during legal proceedings in Australia and the United States]. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
I think I'd prefer the hundred pounds we agreed on. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 6:10 am
Let’s look at the facts of United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am
I think I'd prefer the hundred pounds we agreed on. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 5:56 am
Last but not least, Part V, “Trademarks, Certification Marks and Standards” starts with Chapter 12 “Trademarks, Certification Marks and Technical Standards” authored by Jorge L. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:06 am
The cuts are penny wise and pound foolish. [read post]
20 May 2025, 8:17 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:44 am
The case pitted the American Public Health Association v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
Maheera and Urantia Foundation v. [read post]
