Search for: "State v. Phillips" Results 2541 - 2560 of 2,875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 1 February 2012, judgment was handed down in the cases of Phillips v NGN and Coogan v NGN, (heard 28 and 29 November 2011). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by WSLL
Phillips,Wyoming Attorney General; Robin Sessions Cooley, Deputy Attorney General; JillE. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:02 am by WSLL
Phillips, Attorney General; David L. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:01 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
This week’s resolved cases include: Dolan-Powers v The Observer, Clause 1, 14/12/2012 Weston Area Health NHS Trust v Weston, Worle & Somerset Mercury, Clause 1, 10/12/2012 Lord Hunt, chair of the PCC, has appointed Lord Chris Smith (former Labour culture secretary), Simon Jenkins (former editor of the Times) and Lord Phillips (former president of the supreme court) as unpaid special advisers to help set up a new press regulator. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
I will begin by summarising the present state of that law. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star (Sheffield)… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]
  Updated draft guidelines have not been released by the agencies, but the agencies have stated a goal of releasing new guidelines by the end of this year. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
On the issue of justiciability of the claim based on infringement of United States copyright, the Court had this to say: "87. [read post]
4 May 2013, 8:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Circuit issued an order in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s decision this week to review Husted v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:55 am by Stephen Bilkis
Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Phillips v Joseph Kantor & Co., 31 NY2d 307, 311 [1972]). [read post]